« Which Magazine Goes Next? Cast Your Vote Now | Main | Ignore the Portfolio hype... it'll get here eventually »

April 04, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455e65969e200d83529b02e69e2

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Submitted For Your Approval: Kiplinger's Personal Finance:

Comments

Purplepeeps

Maybe...our sales to reception rooms were down 16% from 2005 to 2006.

I predict that Fast Company or FSB will be on the chopping block this year. In the business and money magazine category.

Knight Kiplinger

Hello, Mr. Reaper...Knight Kiplinger here. I am reminded of Mark Twain's quip, upon reading his own obituary in a newspaper: "Reports of my death are greatly exaggerated." A year after you gave us "15% odds of survival", Kiplinger's magazine is alive and well and showing the resilience of the pioneer that invented personal-finance publishing in 1947.

In the past year Kiplinger's has seen a 17% increase in total audience (spring MRI), compared with +10% at Money and +1% at SmartMoney. We're enjoying the largest increases in newsstand sales in the personal finance category. MRI reported Kiplinger's median household income ($102,000) to be second only to The Economist among ALL magazines it surveys, ahead of BW, Fortune, Barron's, and Forbes, not to mention Money and SmartMoney.

"No discernible web strategy"? LOL, as my kids say. Our 2008 Web ad revenue is up 162% over the first five months of '07, on a 54% gain in monthly page views and unique visitors (many of them younger readers just now discovering the wisdom of Kiplinger). Kiplinger.com just won a 2008 EPpy for "Best Business/Financial Web site" with under one million unique visitors a month (but now well over that), and we were a finalist for an EPpy as "Best National Magazine Web site," and a 2008 Webby honoree for "Best Financial Services" Web site. Kiplinger's Web strategy in the early '00s was to keep our powder dry while SmartMoney and Money lost many millions of dollars expanding too fast--money they won't earn back for years. Now we at Kiplinger are benefiting from surging ad spending on the Web, which is offsetting the demonstrable decline in print ad pages experienced by all magazines.

Mr. Reaper, it is myopic to view magazines today simply as stand-alone enterprises. At Kiplinger, our magazine is just one part of a valuable media franchise (founded on business newsletters) with growing revenue from the Web, custom publishing, sponsored DVDs, cable programming, audio conferences, etc. We're closely held, well capitalized, and we love our work as much as our readers do. Nuff said.

The comments to this entry are closed.